United States v. Hernandez-Hernandez

519 F.3d 1236 (2008)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Hernandez-Hernandez

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
519 F.3d 1236 (2008)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Alfredo Hernandez-Hernandez (defendant) was a Mexican citizen. Hernandez had been deported from the United States twice. One night, Hernandez drank alcohol until he blacked out. Without any recollection of how he got there, Hernandez was present in the United States. Shortly after Hernandez regained his orientation, he was arrested by a United States border-patrol agent. Hernandez did not have legal documentation authorizing his presence in the United States. The government (plaintiff) indicted Hernandez for illegally reentering the United States after a prior deportation. The government filed a motion in limine to exclude any evidence of Hernandez’s voluntary intoxication. Hernandez opposed the motion and argued that because he had no memory of crossing the border, he could have been transported across the border against his will, which would relieve him of criminal liability for illegal entry. However, Hernandez offered no evidence of being transported against his will. The district court granted the government’s motion in limine because illegal entry is a general-intent crime, so voluntary intoxication may not be a defense. Hernandez entered a guilty plea conditioned on his right to appeal the exclusion of evidence of voluntary intoxication. On appeal, Hernandez argued that evidence of his blackout would show that it was possible that he was abducted and did not enter the United States on his own accord.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gorsuch, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership