United States v. Hickey
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
917 F.2d 901 (1990)
Quinn Hickey (defendant) was charged with conspiracy to distribute cocaine. At trial, the prosecution called Jack Ventimiglia to testify against Hickey. During cross-examination, Ventimiglia admitted that he was a cocaine addict, had poor memory, and was unsure about certain details of the matter to which he was testifying. There were also several inconsistencies in Ventimiglia’s testimony. However, the district court admitted Ventimiglia’s testimony, and Hickey was convicted. Hickey appealed, arguing that Ventimiglia’s testimony should not have been admitted, because Ventimiglia was unable to satisfy the personal-knowledge requirement of Federal Rule of Evidence (FRE) 602 due to his addiction and lack of memory.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Milburn, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.