United States v. Holzer (Holzer I)

816 F.2d 304 (1987)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Holzer (Holzer I)

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
816 F.2d 304 (1987)

  • Written by Arlyn Katen, JD

Facts

From 1967 to 1985, Reginald Holzer (defendant) was a trial judge in Cook County, Illinois. During that time, Holzer requested loans from attorneys who appeared before him and from individuals who received court appointments from him, explaining that he was in desperate need of money. Holzer borrowed about $200,000 from these attorneys, and less than $20,000 was repaid. For example, from 1978 to 1983, Holzer borrowed over $35,000 from Ernest Worsek and Worsek’s friend Zilka. During that time, Holzer appointed Worsek to many receiverships, and Worsek made payments on Holzer’s loan from Zilka. In 1983, Worsek told Holzer that he would stop making payments on Zilka’s loan. In response, Holzer stopped appointing Worsek to receiverships. In 1984, Worsek told Holzer that Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents had interviewed Worsek. At Holzer’s request, Worsek met Holzer in another judge’s jury room, where they communicated through handwritten notes that Holzer then destroyed. Afterward, Holzer appointed Worsek to nine more receiverships. Illinois required trial judges to complete annual ethics statements that required judges to confidentially list any creditors owed at least $1,000 and any potential conflicts of interest. Holzer never listed any of the attorneys or court appointees who loaned Holzer money in his annual ethics statements until after Holzer learned that the FBI was investigating him. In candidate questionnaires that Holzer publicly disclosed during his 1974 and 1982 reelection campaigns, Holzer claimed that he never accepted contributions, gifts, or favors. A federal jury convicted Holzer of mail fraud pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1341, extortion under the Hobbs Act, and a violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. The court sentenced Holzer to 18 years in prison. Holzer appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, which considered, in relevant part, whether Holzer’s conduct was fraudulent under the mail-fraud statute.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership