United States v. Hood
United States Supreme Court
343 U.S. 148 (1952)
- Written by Alex Hall, JD
Facts
Under 18 U.S.C. § 215, it was a crime to accept or solicit political contributions in exchange for a promise to influence the selection of government appointments. Hood (defendant) and another individual were indicted for conspiracy to solicit payments from people in exchange for assurances that Hood and the other individual would use their influence to secure them appointments as chairmen of county ration boards. At the time of the exchange, the promised offices did not exist, but the president of the United States had authority to create the offices. The district court dismissed the charges, finding that the statute did not prohibit the sale of offices that did not exist at the time they were promised. The government appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Frankfurter, J.)
Dissent (Black, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.