United States v. Hsu

40 F. Supp. 2d 623 (1999)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Hsu

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
40 F. Supp. 2d 623 (1999)

RW

Facts

The United States government (plaintiff) prosecuted Kai-Lo Hsu (defendant) in federal district court on charges that included conspiring and attempting to steal trade secrets in violation of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (EEA). Hsu was an experienced researcher in the field of anticancer taxol technology. The government’s evidence showed that Hsu (1) sought information about the forthcoming taxol drug from Bristol-Myers Squibb (Bristol-Myers), (2) knew that he could get that information only by bribing a Bristol-Myers employee to turn over confidential Bristol-Myers documents, and (3) believed those documents to contain Bristol-Myers’s trade secrets. An appellate-court interlocutory appeal and the district court’s own in camera review determined that many Bristol-Myers documents actually contained public-domain information, making those documents ineligible for trade-secret protection. Hsu moved to strike the EEA charges on the grounds that the EEA was unconstitutionally vague. At the time, the EEA largely followed the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA) in defining a trade secret, in part, as information that (1) is related to or included in products produced for or placed in interstate or foreign commerce, (2) the owner takes reasonable measures to protect from disclosure, and (3) derives economic value from its not being generally known to or readily ascertainable by the public.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dalzell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership