United States v. Hunter
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
548 F.3d 1308 (2008)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Mackenzie Hunter (defendant) sold a handgun to a teenager who later shot and killed Vanessa Quinn in a shopping center. Hunter pleaded guilty to unlawfully transferring a firearm to a juvenile. Before Hunter was sentenced, Quinn’s parents, Ken and Sue Antrobus (the Antrobuses) moved under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) to have Quinn declared a victim and for the right to make a victim-impact statement and receive restitution. The district court denied the motion, and the Tenth Circuit denied the Antrobuses’s application for a writ of mandamus. After Hunter was sentenced, the Antrobuses appealed Hunter’s sentence and the denial of their motion. The government (plaintiff) moved to dismiss the appeal, arguing that the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal because the Antrobuses were not parties to the underlying criminal case.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tacha, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.