United States v. Hurwitz
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
459 F.3d 463 (2006)
Dr. William Hurwitz (defendant) prescribed very high doses of opioids to manage his patients’ pain. Many of his patients sold the drugs Hurwitz prescribed to them. Hurwitz claimed that the high doses were not improper but were necessary for proper pain management, particularly for patients who had become tolerant to lower doses. The United States (plaintiff) charged Hurwitz with drug trafficking and other crimes under the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 841, for his prescription practices. The district court instructed the jury that it could not consider Hurwitz’s good faith in its analysis of the drug trafficking charge. The jury convicted Hurwitz, and he appealed, arguing that the district court’s jury instructions were improper.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Traxler, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 723,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 723,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.