United States v. Huskey

90 F.4th 651 (2024)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Huskey

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
90 F.4th 651 (2024)

SC

Facts

Dricko Huskey (defendant) was charged with conspiracy under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. Huskey sought to admit into evidence statements made by confidential Federal Bureau of Investigation informants under the residual exception to the hearsay rule. Huskey argued that the statements came with a guarantee of trustworthiness because an informant’s lying to the Federal Bureau of Investigation would defeat the purpose of being an informant in the first place. One informant statement said that Huskey was demoted within his gang but still a member of the gang. Another informant statement said that Huskey had been kicked out of the gang altogether. A third statement said that Huskey was cooperating with law enforcement while in jail in December 2012, despite there not being a record of any arrest of Huskey at that time. Finally, an informant stated that Huskey had moved out of the Shelby, North Carolina, area in 2012, despite other testimony that Huskey was selling drugs in Shelby in 2013. The trial court excluded the informant statements from evidence. Huskey was convicted, and he appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Heytens, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership