Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

United States v. Ince

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
21 F.3d 576 (4th Cir. 1994)


Facts

On September 4, 1994, a rap concert and dance at Fort Belvoir, Virginia ended when members of two of the performing bands got in a fight. Shortly thereafter, a man wearing an orange shirt or jacket fired a gun at trucks leaving the recreation center. Military police pulled over a van carrying Nigel Ince (defendant), Angela Neumann, and two other friends at the exit to Fort Belvoir. Ince was identified by two men as the person who had fired the shots (though he was not wearing an orange shirt at the time). Neumann then gave an unsworn statement to military police officer Roger Stevens that Ince had admitted firing the shots to Neumann. At Ince’s trial, the prosecution called Neumann and asked her to testify regarding Ince’s statements. Neumann claimed she did not recall and the unsworn statement did not refresh her recollection. The prosecution then called Stevens to testify as to what Neumann said, over Ince’s objections. The trial ended with a deadlocked jury. At the second trial, Neumann again did not recall and the prosecution again called Stevens to impeach Neumann as to her memory loss. Stevens testified that Neumann told him that Ince had confessed. Ince’s defense was mistaken identity; that it was another person who had fired the gun. Ince was convicted at the second trial and appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Murnaghan, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 201,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.