Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,300+ case briefs...

United States v. Jackson

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
180 F.3d 55 (1999)


William “Bill” Cosby, Jr., a well-known actor, had an affair with Shawn Thompson. Afterward, Thompson gave birth to Autumn Jackson (defendant) and informed Cosby that Cosby was Jackson’s father. Cosby disputed the paternity claim, but still provided financial support to Jackson for over 20 years. Cosby also established a trust to cover Jackson’s college expenses. In 1995, the attorneys managing Jackson’s college trust learned that Jackson had dropped out of school. The attorneys stopped payments to Jackson. In 1996, Jackson was struggling financially and contacted Cosby by leaving a message under the name Autumn Cosby. In the message, Jackson informed Cosby that she was homeless and needed $2,100. After admonishing Jackson for using his last name, Cosby gave Jackson the funds. When Cosby’s attorneys denied Jackson’s requests for additional funds again in January 1997, Jackson threatened Cosby’s attorneys that she would go to the media with her story of being Cosby’s homeless daughter. When this threat failed, Jackson and Jose Medina (defendant), owner of the production company where Jackson worked, secured a written offer from a tabloid for $25,000. Jackson attempted to send the written offer, along with demands for a settlement of $40 million, to Cosby through his attorneys and CBS officials. Cosby contacted the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which resulted in the arrest of Jackson, Medina, and a Boris Sabas (defendant) as a part of the FBI’s sting operation. Sabas was a colleague of Medina and Jackson who had driven the two to the airport when they flew to New York. Jackson and Medina were convicted of threatening to harm another’s reputation with the intent to extort money under 18 U.S.C. § 875(d). Jackson and Medina appealed on the ground that the jury instruction erroneously failed to require that a threat under § 875(d) be wrongful.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Kearse, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 486,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 486,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,300 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial