United States v. Jackson

368 F.3d 59 (2004)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Jackson

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
368 F.3d 59 (2004)

United States v. Jackson

Facts

Special Agent Matthew White and other agents with the United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) went to the apartment of Aaron Jackson (defendant) and asked him whether he had any firearms or ammunition. Jackson showed the agents a safe containing a quantity of ammunition, which was seized by the agents. The United States (plaintiff) charged Jackson with possession of ammunition by a convicted felon in violation of federal law. At trial, the government entered a certified copy of a 1984 judgment entered in a New York City court showing a person named Aaron Jackson being convicted of unlawful possession of a weapon and of a controlled substance. No other evidence connecting Jackson to the 1984 conviction was presented. Jackson did not present any witnesses or testify in his defense. During closing arguments, defense counsel argued that the government failed to prove that Jackson was the same individual named in the 1984 judgment. Jackson was found guilty. He appealed, arguing that the government failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was the same individual as the one named in the 1984 judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Leval, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership