United States v. James
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
810 F. 3d 674 (2016)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The federal government (plaintiff) prosecuted Christopher James (defendant) for the sexual abuse of a person physically incapable of declining participation in, or communicating unwillingness to engage in, a sexual act. The trial evidence established that James had sex with T.C., a woman incapacitated by cerebral palsy. T.C. needed assistance with all major life activities and was almost completely immobile without a wheelchair. Although T.C. could be unintelligible even to her long-term caregivers, she could and usually did express displeasure or satisfaction through glances, head nods, grunts, and moans, and on occasion she could verbalize yes or no answers to simple questions. A relative discovered James, who was drunk, having sex with T.C. The relative took T.C. to the hospital. The examining nurse testified that T.C. seemed unable to comprehend, and could not answer, the nurse's simple yes-or-no questions. The jury found James guilty, but the judge granted James's Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 29(a) motion and entered a judgment of acquittal on the grounds that the government failed to prove that, physically, T.C. was totally helpless. The government appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tallman, J.)
Dissent (Kozinski, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 795,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.