From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
United States v. Janis
United States Supreme Court
428 U.S. 433 (1976)
Los Angeles police officers searched an apartment pursuant to a warrant. Based on the search, the officers arrested the occupants (plaintiffs) for conducting a bookmaking operation. After seizing the occupants’ bookmaking records, the officers turned the information over to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Relying on these records, the IRS assessed the occupants’ back taxes. A judge ruled that the police search of the apartment was illegal due to defects in the warrant. The occupants took the position that the United States’ (defendant) IRS claim should be dismissed because the evidence upon which it was based had been obtained illegally. The case came before the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Blackmun, J.)
Dissent (Brennan, J.)
Dissent (Stewart, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 617,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.