United States v. Jefferson
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
634 F. Supp. 2d 595 (2009)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
William Jefferson (defendant), a United States congressperson, was indicted for taking bribes in connection with efforts to obtain financial and business-development assistance for African business ventures. The indictment alleged that in exchange for things of value, Jefferson exerted his influence as a congressperson on U.S. and African government officials and agencies through various official acts. The alleged official acts included using official travel to meet with foreign officials, holding meetings with U.S. and foreign officials in the United States, and corresponding (at times on congressional letterhead) with U.S. and foreign officials and agencies. Jefferson moved to dismiss the indictment, contending that the indictment did not identify any “official act” that he performed in exchange for something of value. Denying the motion, the court held that an official act must be among the official duties or settled customary duties or practices of the official, and performance of the act must involve or affect a government decision or action. The government moved for clarification. Jefferson moved for reconsideration of his dismissal motion or exclusion of evidence of conduct that fell outside the definition of an official act.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ellis III, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.