United States v. Jennings

496 F. 3d 344 (2007)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Jennings

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
496 F. 3d 344 (2007)

RW

Facts

The federal government (plaintiff) prosecuted Ryan Jennings (defendant) for abusive sexual contact with a minor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2244(a)(3). Twenty-four-year-old Jennings and Casey, an unaccompanied 13-year-old girl, were seat mates on an overnight cross-country flight. Several hours into the flight a passenger, Linda Columbus, observed Jennings "leaning in close" to Casey. Columbus alerted a flight attendant, who moved Jennings to another seat. Five minutes later Casey sat down next to Karen Schmidt, another passenger. Schmidt testified at trial that Casey, who was visibly shocked, angry, and confused, blurted out that all night Jennings repeatedly groped her buttocks, thighs, and genitalia, and said things that made Casey afraid to call for help. Columbus testified that after landing, as passengers exited the plane, she saw Jennings speak to Casey, which made Casey stop and immediately burst into tears. When asked what was wrong, Casey tearfully told Columbus that Jennings had touched her buttocks and legs. Columbus alerted the flight crew, who detained Jennings until security personnel arrived and arrested him. The jury convicted Jennings. On appeal to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, Jennings argued that the judge erred in admitting Schmidt's and Columbus's hearsay testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(2).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Niemeyer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership