United States v. John Doe, Inc. I
United States Supreme Court
481 U.S. 102 (1987)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
The Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (AD) conducted a grand jury investigation and concluded that criminal prosecution for antitrust violations was unwarranted. The grand jury was discharged. AD attorneys decided there were False Claims Act violations but wanted to consult with the Civil Division (CD) and the United States Attorney’s Office (U.S. attorney), where the civil action would be brought. The AD sought an order permitting disclosure of grand jury material to CD attorneys and the U.S. attorney. The court found that the government’s interest in coordinating fair and efficient enforcement of the False Claims Act and obtaining expert consultation was a particularized need for disclosure. The court of appeals reversed because the information could have been obtained through civil discovery. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens. J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.