United States v. Johnson
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
558 F.2d 744 (1977)
The United States (plaintiff) charged Lewis Johnson (defendant) with filing false income tax returns for his corporations. At trial, Johnson sought to introduce evidence that he had overpaid on his personal income taxes by neglecting to take deductions for which he was eligible. The district court excluded this evidence as irrelevant. A jury convicted Johnson, and he appealed. Johnson argued that the evidence was relevant to demonstrate that he relied in good faith on his accountants in filing both his personal and corporate taxes. According to Johnson, his reliance on his accountants was evidence that he did not have any criminal intent.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Simpson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 173,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.