United States v. Jones
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
580 F.2d 219 (1978)
William Jones (defendant) was charged with illegally tapping telephone calls. The prosecution (plaintiff) was required to prove that the tapped telephone was provided by a common carrier. At trial, the prosecution introduced evidence that the tapped telephone was provided by South Central Bell Telephone Company (Bell). The prosecution did not provide any evidence that Bell was a common carrier, nor did the prosecution request that the district court take judicial notice of Bell’s status as a common carrier. Jones was convicted. Jones filed a motion for a new trial on the ground that the prosecution had failed to make a prima facie showing that Bell was a common carrier. The district court granted the motion. The prosecution appealed, arguing that the court of appeals should take judicial notice of Bell’s status as a common carrier pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence (FRE) 201(f) [now 201(d)], which permitted judicial notice to be taken at any stage of the proceeding.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Engel, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 726,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 726,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.