From our private database of 15,100+ case briefs...

United States v. Josef Altstoetter

International Military Tribunal
Control Council Law No. 10, at 954 (1948)


Facts

After World War II, the Allies negotiated a treaty creating the International Military Tribunal (IMT), a court that would handle the trial and punishment of Nazi German war criminals. When drafting the IMT Charter, the officials agreed that the Nazi leaders should be prosecuted for three offenses: (1) crimes against peace, (2) war crimes, and (3) crimes against humanity. In one trial held in the U.S. occupation zone in Germany, 14 individuals, including a member of the German high command, leaders of the execution squads, doctors who had set up medical experiments, and Nazi judges and prosecutors (defendants), were charged with war crimes and crimes against humanity. The defendants challenged the charges, raising the nullum crimen sine lege defense and arguing that war crimes and crimes against humanity had not been recognized as international law crimes under the IMT Charter and that, therefore, the prosecutions violated ex post facto principles.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 290,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 15,100 briefs, keyed to 205 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.