United States v. Josef Altstoetter
International Military Tribunal
Control Council Law No. 10, at 954 (1948)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
After World War II, the Allies negotiated a treaty creating the International Military Tribunal (IMT), a court that would handle the trial and punishment of Nazi German war criminals. When drafting the IMT Charter, the officials agreed that the Nazi leaders should be prosecuted for three offenses: (1) crimes against peace, (2) war crimes, and (3) crimes against humanity. In one trial held in the U.S. occupation zone in Germany, 14 individuals, including a member of the German high command, leaders of the execution squads, doctors who had set up medical experiments, and Nazi judges and prosecutors (defendants), were charged with war crimes and crimes against humanity. The defendants challenged the charges, raising the nullum crimen sine lege defense and arguing that war crimes and crimes against humanity had not been recognized as international law crimes under the IMT Charter and that, therefore, the prosecutions violated ex post facto principles.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.