United States v. Kah Choon Chay

281 F.3d 682 (2002)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Kah Choon Chay

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
281 F.3d 682 (2002)

  • Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD

Facts

Kah Choon Chay (defendant) was a Malaysian citizen residing in the United States. Chay bought newly released computer games and sent them to a contact in Malaysia for copying. The contact sent back game copies with counterfeit packaging and instructions that Chay would sell online. One of Chay’s former roommates turned over evidence of Chay’s operation to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and after conducting an undercover operation, FBI agents arrested Chay. Chay confessed and pled guilty to one count of trafficking in counterfeit documents and packaging for computer programs in interstate commerce. The plea agreement acknowledged Chay’s willingness to pay restitution to the victims. Because Chay and the U.S. government (plaintiff) could not agree on a figure, the court made the determination and required Chay to pay $49,941.02. Chay was sentenced under 1998 sentencing guidelines. The court set the restitution amount based on evidence presented by the government calculating Chay’s gross sales of pirated games. Specific amounts owed to each victim were calculated based on the number of each victim’s games that were sold and the amount Chay received from the sales. Chay objected to the restitution amount on several grounds. The district court rejected Chay’s arguments, and Chay appealed the decision to the Seventh Circuit. Chay argued that the restitution amount needed to be reconsidered because 1) the government failed to present victim-impact statements to the court, 2) the court failed to consider his financial condition before making a determination, and 3) the calculation did not account for Chay’s manufacturing and distribution costs incurred during the operation.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ripple, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership