United States v. Karo
United States Supreme Court
468 U.S. 705 (1984)
- Written by Sarah Venti, JD
Facts
A government informant who sold ether containers told the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) (plaintiff) that James Karo (defendant) had ordered a large quantity of ether that Karo was going to use to process cocaine. With the informant's consent, the DEA installed a tracking device to monitor the movements of an ether container that Karo used. The DEA continued to rely on the tracking device even after it had been taken inside Karo's home, other residences, and relatively private commercial structures. The court of appeals held that the tracking device violated Karo’s right against unlawful searches and seizures.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
Concurrence (O'Connor, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.