United States v. Keszthelyi

308 F.3d 557 (2002)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Keszthelyi

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
308 F.3d 557 (2002)

Facts

Rudolph Keszthelyi (defendant) was being investigated for dealing cocaine. The police obtained an arrest warrant for Keszthelyi and a search warrant for his home based on evidence obtained from undercover law-enforcement agents and confidential informants. Keszthelyi was arrested in his vehicle on October 8, and cocaine was found in his car. Law enforcement searched his house on the same day and found guns, money, a digital scale, business records, pills, and drug paraphernalia, but no cocaine. The next day, agents decided to re-enter Keszthelyi’s house and continue the search but did not obtain a second search warrant. During this second search on October 9, approximately one ounce of cocaine was found behind Keszthelyi’s oven. On October 11, law enforcement obtained a new warrant to search the house again based on new information obtained from witnesses. No drugs were found during this third search. At trial, Keszthelyi filed a motion to suppress the evidence seized in the three searches based on a number of theories, including that the October 9 search was invalid because a new warrant should have been obtained prior to that search. The district court denied Keszthelyi’s motion, and he appealed the denial.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Moore, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership