United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.
United States Supreme Court
440 U.S. 715 (1979)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
O.K. Super Markets (O.K.) took out a loan from Kimbell Foods, Inc. (Kimbell) (plaintiff). The loan was secured by certain O.K. equipment and merchandise. O.K. then took out a second loan, secured by the same property. This second loan was guaranteed by the United States Small Business Administration (SBA) (defendant). O.K. defaulted on both loans and eventually sold its equipment and inventory. Kimbell brought suit, claiming that its interest in O.K.’s sale proceeds was superior to the SBA’s interest. The Small Business Act, which governed SBA loans, did not address lien priority. The SBA argued, based on the rationale behind applying federal law to federal tax liens, that federal law should apply to prioritize its interest because applying state law to the SBA’s loan program would harm its ability to collect on the loans. On appeal before the United States Supreme Court, the Court considered the question of whether state or federal common law governed the question of whether Kimbell or the SBA had lien priority.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.