United States v. Kimble
United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
2012 WL 2049885 (2012)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The federal government (plaintiff) charged Bobby Lee Kimble and others (defendants) with conspiracy and fraud. The federal district court ordered an 18 U.S.C. § 4241 competency hearing to determine if Kimble had sufficient mental capacity to understand the nature and consequences of the charges or proceedings against him, and to assist properly in his defense. The magistrate judge who conducted the hearing heard evidence that Kimble was of low intelligence, suffered from a mild-to-moderate developmental disability, and was moderately impaired in his ability to function in school or society. A psychiatrist and a psychologist agreed that Kimble did not understand his constitutional rights or the role of courtroom participants. The psychiatrist testified that proper education could remediate some of Kimble's impairment, but that his concentration and cognitive impairments were not remediable. The psychologist, on the other hand, thought that Kimble had the knowledge and ability to stand trial if he received proper medication, if the court kept hearings short, if hearings were conducted in the simplest possible language, and if the court required Kimble to repeat in his own words any statement that might affect his rights.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hornsby, M.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.