United States v. King
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18108, 2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4501 (2000)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Richard King, Jr. (defendant) was charged with sexual abuse of Michael W., who was 15 years old and had learning disabilities. According to the evidence, Michael was out drinking with his friends on the day in question. At 5:30 p.m., Michael went home to change his clothes. When Michael returned to his friends, he told them that King had raped him while he was home. Michael continued drinking and passed out. Sometime after 11:30 p.m., Michael’s mother found him passed out and drove him home. After Michael got home, he told his mother that King had raped him. King filed a motion in limine to exclude Michael’s statement to his mother as hearsay. Several witnesses testified that Michael was shaken for several hours after the incident. The district court denied the motion, ruling that the statement was an excited utterance admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule. King was convicted, and he appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 819,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.