Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

United States v. Knights

United States Supreme Court
534 U.S. 112 (2001)


Facts

Mark James Knights (defendant) was sentenced to summary probation for a drug conviction. As a condition of probation, Knights was ordered to allow any probation or law enforcement officer to search his person or property without a warrant or reasonable cause. Knights signed the order stating that he understood and agreed to the terms of probation. Later, a detective with the Napa County Sheriff’s Department began to suspect Knights and Steven Simoneau of committing a series of acts of vandalism against Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E). After seeing suspicious materials in Simoneau’s truck parked in Knights’ driveway, the detective decided to search Knights’ apartment. Because of the search provision in Knights’ probation order, the detective did not believe he needed a warrant. The detective found bomb making materials and evidence of the PG&E vandalism and arrested Knights. Knights was indicted by a grand jury in federal court. Knights then moved to suppress the evidence found during the search, and the district court granted the motion because the search was conducted for investigative instead of probationary purposes. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.