United States v. Lanier
United States Supreme Court
520 U.S. 259 (1997)

- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
David Lanier (defendant) was a state-court judge who sexually assaulted five women in his judicial chambers. Lanier was charged with 11 counts of willfully violating the women’s constitutional rights under color of law, under 18 U.S.C. § 242. Lanier was convicted on seven counts and appealed. A panel of the court of appeals affirmed the conviction, but the full court vacated that decision and granted rehearing en banc. The full court then reversed Lanier’s conviction and gave instructions to dismiss the indictment, finding that there had been a lack of notice that § 242 was applicable to sexual-assault crimes. The court held that criminal liability under § 242 could only be applied if the constitutional right said to have been violated had first been identified in a Supreme Court decision that held the right applied in a fundamentally similar situation. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Souter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.