United States v. Larson
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
66 M.J. 212 (2008)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
Major John R. Larson (defendant) worked in a private office with a lockable door. Inside the office was a government-owned computer for use by Larson in connection with his official duties. Larson’s computer was password protected with a password he had chosen, but a systems administrator had access to all of the computer’s files. Larson’s commander also had access to all files that were not individually password protected. Each time Larson logged onto the computer, he was required to acknowledge that the computer belonged to the Department of Defense, that he was prohibited from using it for illegal activity, and that it was for official use. Larson was also required to consent to monitoring of the computer. After Larson was arrested in a civilian-police sting operation targeting sexual predators, Larson’s commander allowed Air Force investigators to enter Larson’s office using a master key and seize the computer. During their search of the computer, investigators found pornographic material and sexually explicit chats between Larson and an individual Larson believed was an underage girl. Larson was tried by a general court-martial and convicted of several crimes, including attempted carnal knowledge and attempted indecent acts with a minor. Prior to his trial, Larson moved to suppress the evidence found on his computer, arguing that the warrantless search had violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The military judge denied his motion, and the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed. Larson appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ryan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.