United States v. Ledezma
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
26 F.3d 636 (1994)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The federal government (plaintiff) prosecuted Josephine Ledezma and Terry Zajac (defendant) for conspiracy to commit the crime of possessing with intent to distribute 1,600 kilograms of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846 (count one), and for aiding and abetting the § 841(a)(1) offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 (count two). The federal district court trial evidence established that Ledezma, her brother Manny Castellano, and her cousin Ricardo Rios were all part of a family-run drug-trafficking business. Zajac joined the business only after it was up and running. Wiretap evidence proved Ledezma's involvement in the conspiracy. There were two significant items of evidence against Zajac. First, Zajac helped Castellano transfer 244 kilograms of cocaine from Rios's house to a safer location. Second, although Zajac played no role in planning or instigating the shipment of 351 kilograms of cocaine to Texas, Zajac complied with Castellano's direction to pay Robert Ferrell for completing the shipment's delivery. Zajac was unaware that federal authorities had already confiscated the shipment. The jury convicted Ledezma and Zajac on both counts. Zajac's conviction on count two was based solely on his connection with the 351-kilogram cocaine shipment. On appeal to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, Zajac argued that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ryan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.