United States v. Lee

296 F.3d 792 (2002)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Lee

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
296 F.3d 792 (2002)

AR
Play video

Facts

Kent Lee (defendant), a video-rental store owner, pleaded conditionally guilty to wire fraud after he created a website to defraud Japanese runners who wanted to compete in the Honolulu Marathon. The official marathon website did not permit online registration from Japan, so Lee created a fake site that included a registration form in Japanese that collected credit-card numbers. Lee created the fake site by copying the real site’s files onto a computer server. The creator of the legitimate site testified that Lee could have created his fake site without knowing much about the site itself by using off-the-shelf software. Alternatively, Lee could have used a text editor to copy the website page by page. After Lee’s conviction, the trial court imposed a special-skills sentence enhancement that increased the conviction’s penalties. Lee appealed, arguing that the prosecution failed to prove he used special skills to create the fake website.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kleinfeld, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership