United States v. LeMay
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
260 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. 2001)
Fred LeMay (defendant) was charged with sexually molesting two of his minor nephews in 1997. The nephews testified at trial, but LeMay claimed that they were lying. The prosecution sought to introduce testimony, over LeMay’s objection, that LeMay had been convicted of raping two of his minor cousins in 1989. The circumstances surrounding LeMay’s prior rape conviction were very similar to the molestation charge, because the victims were LeMay’s relatives and the alleged act was forced oral copulation while LeMay was babysitting. LeMay argued that the admission of this evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence (FRE) 414 violated his due-process rights. The district court, after hearing all of the prosecution’s other evidence, determined that the testimony regarding the prior rape conviction was admissible under FRE 403 and 414. LeMay was convicted, and he appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Trott, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 173,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.