United States v. Loscalzo
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
18 F.3d 374 (1994)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Anthony Loscalzo (defendant), Merry Stumpf (defendant), David Siegel (defendant) and Albert Boemo (defendant) were convicted of conspiracy to defraud the United States and 31 counts of mail fraud. At trial, the government alleged that the defendants conspired to obstruct the U.S. Postal Service in its awarding of minority enterprise contracts by creating corporations with non-participating minority individuals named as figurehead presidents. In addition to the substantive conspiracy charge, the government offered an alternative aiding and abetting theory to allow the jury to find the defendants guilty of conspiracy if they found either that the defendants were parties to the original agreement and committed an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy or, alternatively, that the defendants performed some act which they knew would further the conspiracy. The jury convicted all defendants. Loscalzo, Boemo, and Stumpf appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bauer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.