United States v. Lui Kin-Hong

110 F.3d 103 (1997)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Lui Kin-Hong

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
110 F.3d 103 (1997)

RW

Facts

A 1984 treaty between the United Kingdom (UK) and China provided for Hong Kong to revert from UK to Chinese control in July 1997. A 1986 extradition treaty between the UK and the United States (US) applied to economic crimes but excluded political crimes. Lui Kin-Hong (defendant) was a bribery suspect who had eluded Hong Kong authorities since April 1994. In December 1995, Lui flew to the United States, where at the UK’s request and pursuant to the UK-US treaty, the federal government arrested Lui and commenced extradition proceedings. In August 1996 a magistrate judge found probable cause to extradite Lui to face bribery charges in Hong Kong. Lui immediately filed a habeas corpus petition. The district court granted Lui’s petition in January 1997. The court reasoned that Lui could not be tried before Hong Kong’s July 1997 reversion to Chinese control and that the UK-US treaty did not contemplate subjecting extradited defendants to Chinese jurisdiction. The government appealed to the First Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lynch, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership