United States v. Lumbard
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
706 F.3d 716 (2013)
- Written by Kelli Lanski, JD
Facts
Nathan Lumbard (defendant) was arrested by Michigan authorities, charged with multiple crimes, and released on bail. He decided to flee the United States to avoid jail. Justin Cheesebrew agreed to provide Lumbard with his name, his social-security number, and other identifying information in exchange for $500. Lumbard took Cheesebrew’s information and requested a passport, driver’s license, and birth certificate. The passport included Cheesebrew’s name but Lumbard’s picture. Lumbard then staged his own death by placing a suicide note and suitcase near a river and leaving a voicemail for police suggesting where they could look for his body. Lumbard then booked a flight out of the country and evaded capture abroad until the United States Department of State located him. He was arrested and returned to the United States. Lumbard confessed his scheme with Cheesebrew and was indicted for criminalized identity theft under 18 U.S.C. § 1028A, among other crimes. He pled guilty but reserved the right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the identity-theft charge. Lumbard was sentenced to 48 months in prison. He appealed the denial of his motion to dismiss, arguing that 18 U.S.C. § 1028A, which prohibited the use of another person’s identification without lawful authority, excluded cases like his, because he had Cheesebrew’s permission to use his identifying information.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Collier, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.