United States v. Lyons
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
731 F.2d 243, 739 F.2d 994 (1984)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Robert Lyons (defendant) was charged with unlawfully obtaining controlled narcotics. Lyons had been prescribed pain-killing narcotics to treat medical conditions and had become addicted. Lyons intended to present an insanity defense based on expert-witness testimony that his addiction had affected his brain physiologically and psychologically to the point that Lyons had lacked substantial capacity to act lawfully. The prosecution moved to exclude evidence of Lyons’s addiction. The trial court granted the motion, effectively preventing Lyons from raising his insanity defense at trial. Lyons was convicted. Lyons appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Initially, a three-judge panel reversed the conviction and ordered a new trial, holding that the jury should decide whether an involuntary drug addiction was a mental disease that could support an insanity defense. However, the Fifth Circuit then agreed to rehear the matter en banc, meaning before the entire court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gee, J.)
Dissent (Rubin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.