Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

United States v. MacDonald & Watson Waste Oil Co.

933 F.2d 35 (1st Cir. 1991)

Case BriefQ&ARelatedOptions
From our private database of 22,600+ case briefs...

United States v. MacDonald & Watson Waste Oil Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

933 F.2d 35 (1st Cir. 1991)

Facts

Eugene D’Allesandro (defendant) was president, and a “hands on” manager, of MacDonald & Watson Waste Oil Company (MacDonald) (defendant), a company that transported and disposed of hazardous, contaminated wastes. MacDonald operated a disposal facility at the Poe Street Lot (Lot), a facility leased from the Narrangansett Improvement Company (NIC). Neither MacDonald nor NIC held a permit to dispose of solid hazardous waste at the Lot, although NIC held a permit to dispose of liquid wastes there. MacDonald was hired to remove solid waste, toluene-contaminated soil, from Master Chemical Company’s location and to dispose of it at the Lot. A consultant had warned D’Allesandro on two prior occasions that MacDonald’s receipt of toluene-contaminated soil from other customers violated NIC’s permit Subsequently, D’Allesandro was convicted of knowingly transporting and causing the transportation of hazardous waste to a facility that did not have a permit in violation of § 3008(d)(1) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). D’Allesandro appealed, arguing that the district judge incorrectly instructed the jury regarding the element of knowledge in the case of a corporate officer.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Campbell, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 519,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions and answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 22,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership