Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

United States v. Maginnis

356 F.3d 1179 (2004)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 30,500+ case briefs...

United States v. Maginnis

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

356 F.3d 1179 (2004)

Facts

In 1991 J. Michael Maginnis (defendant), along with his wife and sons, won $23 million in the Oregon state lottery. Maginnis and his wife took $9 million each, and their sons divided the remaining $5 million. Maginnis’s share was to be paid by Oregon via an annuity policy in 20 installments of $450,000. In 1996 Maginnis assigned his rights to receive the remaining 15 payments to Woodbridge Financial Corporation (Woodbridge) in exchange for $3,950,000. On his 1996 federal income-tax return, Maginnis reported the $3,950,000 as ordinary income and paid the tax liability. He also classified the payment as ordinary income for state tax purposes. In 1998 Maginnis filed an amended 1996 return. Maginnis argued that he was owed a refund of approximately $305,000 because he had realized capital gain rather than ordinary income on the payment from Woodbridge. The Internal Revenue Service (the IRS) granted Maginnis the refund. In 2001 the United States government (plaintiff) filed a complaint against Maginnis arguing that the IRS had granted the refund in error. The government asserted that the payment from Woodbridge was ordinary income and claimed that Maginnis was estopped from arguing that the money was a capital gain because he had classified it as ordinary income on his state taxes. The government moved for summary judgment. The district court affirmed the motion, finding that Maginnis experienced no asset appreciation. Maginnis appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fisher, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 551,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 30,500 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership