United States v. Majeroni

No. 2:13-cr-37-GZS (2013)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Majeroni

United States District Court for the District of Maine
No. 2:13-cr-37-GZS (2013)

Facts

Timothy Majeroni (defendant) was charged with possession of child pornography based on pornographic materials found on his laptop computer. Prior to trial, the United States (plaintiff) moved to admit evidence that Majeroni had pleaded guilty to child-pornography possession in 2001. That prior guilty plea and subsequent conviction were also based on pornographic materials found on Majeroni’s laptop computer. The government moved to admit the evidence of Majeroni’s prior conviction under Federal Rule of Evidence 414, which provides that in criminal cases involving child molestation, the court may admit evidence that the defendant committed any other child molestation. Majeroni conceded that the 2001 conviction and the charges pending against him both involved child molestation as defined by Rule 414(d)(2). However, Majeroni argued that the evidence of his prior conviction was inadmissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 403 because its probative value was substantially outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice. Specifically, Majeroni asserted that the 12-year time gap between his prior conviction and the pending charges made the evidence of the prior conviction unfairly prejudicial. Majeroni also argued that the government had substantial evidence besides the conviction that it could use to meet its burden of proof.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Singal, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 734,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 734,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 734,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership