United States v. Male Juvenile
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
280 F.3d 1008 (2002)
- Written by Meredith Hamilton Alley, JD
Facts
Pierre Y. (defendant) was a Native American juvenile. The Fort Peck Tribal Police (the police) detained Pierre for breaking into Kae Spottedbull’s house and stealing her property. Pierre confessed. Later, the police detained Pierre for breaking into Derek Bridges’ house and stealing his property. Pierre confessed. Pierre was tried in the Fort Peck Tribal Court Youth Court (the tribal court) for breaking into Spottedbull’s house and stealing her property. The tribal court found that Pierre was guilty and sentenced him to 90 days for theft and 90 days for burglary, to be served consecutively. Two months later, the United States (plaintiff) charged Pierre in federal district court with two counts of juvenile delinquency in relation to breaking into Spottedbull’s house and stealing her property and breaking into Bridges’ house and stealing his property. The court found that Pierre committed both break-ins and adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent. The federal trial court sentenced Pierre to 24 months in custody. Pierre appealed. One of his arguments was that the federal prosecution in federal district court violated the Fifth Amendment prohibition against double jeopardy because he had already been tried and convicted for theft and burglary of Spottedbull’s house and property.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brunetti, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.