United States v. Maloney
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
71 F.3d 645 (1995)
The federal government (plaintiff) prosecuted Thomas J. Maloney (defendant), a retired Chicago judge, for conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). The federal district court trial evidence established that, between 1977 and 1983, Maloney conspired with lawyers to "fix" their cases in return for bribes. Maloney suspended his bribe-taking after a 1983 investigation spotlighted judicial corruption in Chicago. The spotlight had dimmed by 1986, when Maloney was assigned to conduct Earl Hawkins's high-profile bench trial for murder. Hawkins's lawyer was named Swano. Acting as Maloney's "bagman," or intermediary, Robert McGee told Swano that, if Swano paid a $10,000 bribe and could put up a reasonable defense, Maloney would "throw" the trial in Hawkins's favor. Swano paid the bribe. Later, McGee told Swano that Maloney was having second thoughts. According to Hawkins, Swano told him that Maloney had returned the bribe because the case was "too hot" and was being watched by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for signs of a fix. Swano, however, testified that Maloney personally reassured Swano, twice, that he would keep the bribe and decide the case for Hawkins. According to Swano, Maloney did not return the money until the end of the trial, when the strength of the prosecution's case persuaded Maloney that Hawkins's acquittal would seem suspicious and draw FBI attention. Maloney argued that his return of Swano's money showed that he wanted to withdraw from a corrupt conspiracy. However, the court denied Maloney's motion for a jury instruction on the withdrawal defense, and the jury found Maloney guilty. Maloney appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Eschbach, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.