United States v. Manatau

647 F.3d 1048 (2011)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Manatau

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
647 F.3d 1048 (2011)

KL

Facts

Afuhia Masiu Manatau (defendant) was arrested after he was caught writing and cashing checks that did not belong to him. Manatau had stolen convenience checks, which are issued by credit-card companies to account holders, who can write and cash the checks against their lines of credit, charging the amount of the check to their credit cards. At the time he was arrested, Manatau had written and cashed convenience checks totaling $1,800. He did not have any stolen checks remaining in his possession. The credit limits on the credit cards he stole totaled over $60,000. Manatau pled guilty to bank fraud and identity theft. The United States (plaintiff) took the position that his offense level at sentencing should be increased based on the combined value of all the credit limits for the accounts impacted by his scheme. Manatau argued that he did not know the credit limits of each of the cards at the time he stole or used them and therefore could not intend to steal up to the entire credit limit, nor could he do so as a practical matter because he did not have any convenience checks left. The district court sided with the United States and sentenced Manatau based on the higher offense level the prosecution requested. Manatau appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gorsuch, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership