United States v. Mara
United States Supreme Court
410 U.S. 19, 93 S. Ct. 774 (1973)
- Written by Haley Gintis, JD
Facts
Richard J. Mara (defendant) was subpoenaed by a grand jury to produce handwriting exemplars on two separate occasions. Mara was informed that he was being investigated as a potential suspect involving interstate shipment thefts. Mara refused to provide the handwriting exemplars on both occasions. In response, the government (plaintiff) petitioned the district court to compel Mara to produce the handwriting exemplars. Mara objected on the ground that compelling him to submit the handwriting exemplars violated his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. The district court rejected the claim that the grand-jury request violated Mara’s Fourth Amendment rights and ordered Mara to produce the handwriting exemplars. Mara refused. Mara was held in civil contempt and taken into custody. Mara appealed. The court of appeals reversed the district court’s judgment, holding that a grand jury’s request for physical evidence, such as handwriting exemplars, must be reasonable but that probable cause was not required. The matter was appealed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)
Dissent (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
