Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

United States v. Martin

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
228 F.3d 1 (2000)


Facts

Caryn Camp was an unhappy chemist working for INDEXX, Inc. (INDEXX). While looking for jobs one day, Camp contacted Stephen Martin (defendant). Martin owned a company called WDV, Inc. Camp and Martin became pen pals, discussing their personal lives, families, and career aspirations. At first, the discussion was only casual. Soon Camp and Martin began discussing the details of their jobs, and Martin began to request specific confidential information about INDEXX. Martin expressed interest in forming a company that would compete with INDEXX. Camp provided this information, noting that she felt “like a spy” while doing so. The information exchange continued to escalate, with Camp’s providing confidential, competitive information and INDEXX property upon Martin’s request and encouragement. One day, Camp inadvertently sent an email intended for Martin to an INDEXX manager. Federal Bureau of Investigation agents approached Camp, and Camp agreed to cooperate with the prosecution of Martin for violation of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (EEA). In the prosecution, the jury found Martin guilty of conspiracy to steal trade secrets in violation of the EEA. Martin appealed, arguing that he had no agreement with Camp and did not intend to injure INDEXX, and that the information he received did not constitute a protectable trade secret.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Torruella, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.