United States v. Martin

189 F.3d 547 (1999)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Martin

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
189 F.3d 547 (1999)

Facts

Henry Martin (defendant) was on trial for a bank robbery. Before Martin’s trial, he claimed he could not afford an attorney because he was indigent and requested a free attorney be appointed to him. As a defense to the charge of bank robbery during trial, however, Martin claimed that he was financially secure and therefore had no motive to rob the bank. During Martin’s testimony about his financial security, the trial judge asked questions to clarify Martin’s inconsistencies about his financial situation. Following Martin’s testimony, the judge instructed the jury that they should make no inference from the judge’s questioning of Martin. The judge also posed questions of other witnesses, including those of the prosecution. The judge claimed that he was questioning the witness to protect the integrity of the program that provided free attorneys for indigent defendants. Martin appealed his conviction, claiming that the judge’s questioning of him unfairly prejudiced the jury.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Manion, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 741,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 741,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 741,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership