United States v. Martinez
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
476 F.3d 961 (2007)

- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
William Martinez (defendant) was a former government official in El Salvador who was part of a conspiracy that sought to import large quantities of cocaine into the United States. The cocaine was shipped by sea from Columbia to El Salvador, and then transported by truck through Guatemala and Mexico into the United States. Martinez ran the complex middle segment in the transportation scheme. He oversaw the transfer of the cocaine from large oceangoing vessels off the El Salvador coast onto smaller boats that brought the cocaine to shore, provided for secure storage of the cocaine, and then managed the reloading of the cocaine onto large trucks for overland transportation. Martinez recruited, supervised, paid, and sometimes threatened the workers who assisted in these steps. After receiving information from an informant, agents from the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and Guatemalan officials stopped three of the conspiracy’s large trucks carrying more than 2,500 kilograms of cocaine on the main highway that ran from Guatemala to Mexico. The DEA later arrested Martinez and charged him with federal drug importation crimes under 21 U.S.C. § 959(a). Martinez was convicted and appealed. He alleged that the evidence was insufficient to prove that he had the knowledge and intent that the cocaine was destined for importation into the United States as required by the statute.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kavanaugh, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.