United States v. Martinez-Figueroa
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
363 F. 3d 679 (2004)
- Written by Joe Cox, JD
Facts
In a criminal prosecution, Luciano Martinez-Figueroa (defendant) was charged with conspiracy to distribute marijuana and intent to distribute. Martinez-Figueroa was driving a tractor-trailer on Interstate 44 near Joplin, Missouri, when he was stopped by law enforcement. Martinez-Figueroa consented for the vehicle to be searched, and the trailer included not only a load of cheddar cheese, but also 537 kilograms of marijuana. Police officer Banasik questioned Martinez-Figueroa at the site of the arrest after reading Martinez-Figueroa his Miranda rights. Although Martinez-Figueroa initially denied committing the crimes, the driver eventually admitted that he knew that he was hauling marijuana. Banasik used Martinez-Figueroa’s trucking logbook in the questioning. Specifically, the logbook indicated that Martinez-Figueroa had taken an unusual route from California toward Crawfordsville, Indiana, where the cheese was to be delivered. For instance, Martinez-Figueroa stayed in California for two days and then traveled in the same areas in New Mexico and Texas for two more days. No seal was present on the trailer door when police stopped Martinez-Figueroa, which was contrary to the bill of lading for the cheese. At trial, Martinez-Figueroa admitted to falsifying his logbook to avoid governmental trucking regulations and denied several other acts, including being at the truck stop in question, knowing an undercover agent, or removing the seal from the truck’s trailer. During the trial, Banasik testified about using the logbook to question Martinez-Figueroa, and Martinez-Figueroa and another witness also testified about the logbook. Martinez-Figueroa was convicted, and the appellate court affirmed the conviction. On appeal, Martinez-Figueroa argued that Banasik was improperly allowed to testify as an expert witness regarding the truck’s logbook, as Banasik’s opinions had not been provided in a witness summary, as required for an expert witness.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Loken, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 796,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.