United States v. Massachusetts
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
493 F.3d 1 (2007)
- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
After a catastrophic oil spill in one of its harbors, Massachusetts (defendant) enacted the Massachusetts Oil Spill Prevention Act (MOSPA). MOSPA had a financial-assurance requirement requiring oil tankers to post a $1 billion bond unless they met certain safety requirements, such as being double-hulled. MOSPA allowed state agencies to calibrate the amount of the bond based on a case-by-case basis. The United States (plaintiff) sued for an injunction, arguing that MOSPA was preempted by the federal Ports and Waterways Safety Act of 1972 and resulted in Massachusetts engaging in impermissible indirect regulation of oil tankers. The district court ruled in the United States’ favor, and Massachusetts appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lynch, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.