United States Supreme Court
415 U.S. 164 (1974)
William Matlock (defendant) was indicted for robbing a federally insured bank. Matlock shared a room with Gayle Graff in a home rented by Graff’s parents. Law enforcement knew that Matlock lived in the home but did not know in which room. Law enforcement arrived at the home and arrested Matlock in the front yard. The officers proceeded to the home, and Graff consented to a search of the home, including the bedroom that Graff told the officers she shared with Matlock. The officers found incriminating evidence against Matlock. Matlock filed a motion to suppress the evidence. During the suppression hearing, the district court excluded as hearsay Graff’s statement about sharing a bedroom with Matlock and testimony stating that Graff and Matlock held themselves out to be husband and wife to various people. The district court found that the prosecution had failed to prove that Graff’s consent to the search was binding on Matlock. The court of appeals affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
Dissent (Brennan, J.)
Dissent (Douglas, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.