United States v. McCray

2017 WL 6471654 (2017)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
U
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. McCray

United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
2017 WL 6471654 (2017)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

William McCray (defendant) was indicted for sex trafficking of a minor and other crimes. The government (plaintiff) moved in limine to allow the victim, A.B., to be in the courtroom during the trial and related proceedings, arguing that the victim was entitled under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) to attend the trial even if she would be testifying. The government maintained that because A.B. was the only victim in the case, she would not be influenced by other victims’ testimony; A.B. had been interviewed by law enforcement, including twice on video, making any alterations in her testimony impeachable; and all of A.B.’s testimony would be corroborated by other evidence. McCray objected and maintained that the victim should be required to observe the proceeding remotely by video feed, which would eliminate the prejudicial effect of her presence in the courtroom and the government’s improper effort to inject sympathy into the trial.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Duffey, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Criminal Procedure

Key Terms