United States v. McDade
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19254 (1992)
- Written by Arlyn Katen, JD
Facts
Congressman Joseph McDade (defendant) was federally charged with conspiracy, racketeering, and accepting illegal gratuities. About 100 days before trial, McDade contested that the prosecution (plaintiff) had disclosed so many documents that discovery filled three rooms of filing cabinets in Philadelphia, New York, and Virginia offices. Discovery also included 2,400 hours of tape-recorded conversations. McDade claimed that the defense team had hired 12 people to help review the discovery. For perspective, each member of the 12-person discovery team would need to spend 20 10-hour days listening to tapes for the defense to pass through the tape-recorded conversations just once. McDade claimed that the avalanche of discovery had rendered the defense incapable of distilling what would be relevant to the trial. The prosecution replied that this far ahead of trial, McDade had no right to know which documents the government would use at trial; that information was attorney work product, and a list of witnesses and exhibits would effectively be a blueprint of the prosecution’s trial strategy.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gawthrop, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
